<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Data for Breakfast</title>
	<link>http://dataforbreakfast.com</link>
	<description>Damn that's some tasty data</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 11:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Molly White is FAMOUS!</title>
		<link>http://dataforbreakfast.com/?p=388</link>
		<comments>http://dataforbreakfast.com/?p=388#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[team]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dataforbreakfast.com/?p=388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those of you who don&#8217;t know her&#8230; she&#8217;s kind of a big deal.
furniture Videnov
pages-from-agency-03-24-08-adweek-molly-white-from-media-department-pictured-at-our-kids-are-born-digital-meeting-march-13th-of-the-s-florida-interactive-mktg-assoc-of-ftl.pdf
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those of you who don&#8217;t know her&#8230; she&#8217;s kind of a big deal.</p>
<p><a href="http://dataforbreakfast.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/molly-white.png" title="molly-white.png"><font style="position: absolute;overflow: hidden;height: 0;width: 0"><a href="http://www.videnov.com/">furniture Videnov</a></font><img src="http://dataforbreakfast.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/molly-white.png" alt="molly-white.png" /></a><br />
<a href="http://dataforbreakfast.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/pages-from-agency-03-24-08-adweek-molly-white-from-media-department-pictured-at-our-kids-are-born-digital-meeting-march-13th-of-the-s-florida-interactive-mktg-assoc-of-ftl.pdf" title="pages-from-agency-03-24-08-adweek-molly-white-from-media-department-pictured-at-our-kids-are-born-digital-meeting-march-13th-of-the-s-florida-interactive-mktg-assoc-of-ftl.pdf">pages-from-agency-03-24-08-adweek-molly-white-from-media-department-pictured-at-our-kids-are-born-digital-meeting-march-13th-of-the-s-florida-interactive-mktg-assoc-of-ftl.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dataforbreakfast.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=388</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>comScore: Consumer Trends in Social Networking</title>
		<link>http://dataforbreakfast.com/?p=385</link>
		<comments>http://dataforbreakfast.com/?p=385#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 21:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dataforbreakfast.com/?p=385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It’s commonly thought that with the success of sites like MySpace and Facebook, the U.S. is the hub of social networking activity. However, Asia is not only the fastest-growing region for social networking, it is also the largest:
By contrast, fewer Latin Americans visit social networking sites, but are much more engaged:

Each region has a different [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It’s commonly thought that with the success of sites like MySpace and Facebook, the U.S. is the hub of social networking activity. However, Asia is not only the fastest-growing region for social networking, it is also the largest:<img src="http://www.comscore.com/blog/sn_regional_growth.png" /><br />
By contrast, fewer Latin Americans visit social networking sites, but are much more engaged:<br />
<img src="http://www.comscore.com/blog/sn_engagement_region.png" /><br />
Each region has a different leader as measured by total time spent. Friendster, for example, was once a pioneer in the U.S. but now attracts a relatively small U.S. audience (North Americans spent 4.4 million hours on Friendster in August 2007 - seventh overall in North America - versus MySpace’s leading 223.1 million hours). However, people in Asia spend more time on Friendster than any other social networking site.<br />
<img src="http://www.comscore.com/blog/sn_by_region.png" /><br />
If you are a global marketer, there’s a great opportunity to capitalize on the rapid adoption of social networking sites outside of the U.S. But you’re going to have to ‘get local’ and understand which sites will maximize your reach in a particular region.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.comscore.com/blog/2007/10/consumer_trends_in_social_netw.html " target="_blank">http://www.comscore.com/blog/2007/10/consumer_trends_in_social_netw.html </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dataforbreakfast.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=385</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>comScore: Display Advertising on MySpace and Facebook</title>
		<link>http://dataforbreakfast.com/?p=384</link>
		<comments>http://dataforbreakfast.com/?p=384#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 21:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dataforbreakfast.com/?p=384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What the comScore data reveal is that MySpace is far more developed as an advertising platform than Facebook – along a variety of dimensions. For example, in September MySpace attracted 68.4 million unique visitors, 2.2 times the 30.6 million that visited Facebook. But, MySpace visitors also consumed 1.4 times more pages per visitor and MySpace [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What the comScore data reveal is that MySpace is far more developed as an advertising platform than Facebook – along a variety of dimensions. For example, in September MySpace attracted 68.4 million unique visitors, 2.2 times the 30.6 million that visited Facebook. But, MySpace visitors also consumed 1.4 times more pages per visitor and MySpace delivered 2.2 times more ads on each page viewed (with each ad being about twice the size of the ads run on Facebook). Cumulatively, this translates into MySpace delivering 6.6 times more display ad views than Facebook.<img src="http://www.comscore.com/blog/display_ads_delivered.png" /></p>
<p>Clearly, these data point to the huge upside that exists for Facebook to increase its advertising business relative to MySpace by continuing to build its user base (Facebook unique visitors in September were up 129% versus year ago while MySpace increased by a slower 23%) and by increasing the number of ads they’re delivering per page viewed. Of course, it can be expected that, as the number of ads delivered on Facebook increases, astute marketers will also begin paying more attention to changes in the “share of advertising views” that they’re getting within their particular product category and target audience to see if their “share of voice” is declining.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dataforbreakfast.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=384</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>eMarketer: Adults E-Mail, Teens IM</title>
		<link>http://dataforbreakfast.com/?p=382</link>
		<comments>http://dataforbreakfast.com/?p=382#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 21:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[IM]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[teens]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dataforbreakfast.com/?p=382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nearly half of teens ages 13 to 18 use instant messaging, according to an AP-AOL study conducted by Knowledge Networks.Three-quarters of adults said they sent more e-mails than instant messages. The ratio was nearly reversed for teens, many of whom liked the distance that IM put between them in some conversations.
Only about one in five [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nearly half of teens ages 13 to 18 use instant messaging, according to an <a href="http://www.ap.org/" target="blank">AP</a>-<a href="http://www.aol.com/" target="blank">AOL</a> study conducted by <a href="http://www.knowledgenetworks.com/" target="blank">Knowledge Networks.</a><span id="lblBody" class="grey_text2">Three-quarters of adults said they sent more e-mails than instant messages. The ratio was nearly reversed for teens, many of whom liked the distance that IM put between them in some conversations.</p>
<p><span id="lblBody" class="grey_text2">Only about one in five adults said they used instant messaging.</span></p>
<p><a href="http://dataforbreakfast.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/teens-vs-adults.gif" title="teens-vs-adults.gif"><img src="http://dataforbreakfast.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/12/teens-vs-adults.gif" alt="teens-vs-adults.gif" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?id=1005669&amp;src=article_head_sitesearch" target="_blank">http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?id=1005669&amp;src=article_head_sitesearch</a></p>
<p></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dataforbreakfast.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=382</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Women Are Better Multitaskers</title>
		<link>http://dataforbreakfast.com/?p=381</link>
		<comments>http://dataforbreakfast.com/?p=381#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 20:59:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dataforbreakfast.com/?p=381</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Women are better at multitasking than men, according to 60% of respondents of both genders in a Nokia-sponsored study conducted by Illuminas.
Only 6% of women believed that men were better at handling multiple tasks simultaneously.
More than six in 10 respondents did two or three things while on their mobile phone. When asked what was the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span id="lblBody" class="grey_text2">Women are better at multitasking than men, according to 60% of respondents of both genders in a <a href="http://www.nokia.com/" target="blank">Nokia</a>-sponsored study conducted by <a href="http://www.illuminas-global.com/" target="blank">Illuminas</a>.</p>
<p>Only 6% of women believed that men were better at handling multiple tasks simultaneously.</p>
<p>More than six in 10 respondents did two or three things while on their mobile phone. When asked what was the most fun activity to do while on their mobile phone, most said &#8220;being in bed.&#8221;</p>
<p>Nearly eight in 10 respondents said they considered themselves multitaskers. One-half described themselves as &#8216;productive&#8217; and 31% said they were &#8216;busy.&#8217;</p>
<p>Illuminas surveyed 5,000 visitors to Nokia&#8217;s Web site in during October and November, 2007. Respondents came from the United Kingdom, Spain, Finland, Italy, China, Brazil, Germany, Denmark, France, USA, Sweden and Norway.</p>
<p></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dataforbreakfast.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=381</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consumer Trust</title>
		<link>http://dataforbreakfast.com/?p=379</link>
		<comments>http://dataforbreakfast.com/?p=379#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 17:50:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[consumer trust]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dataforbreakfast.com/?p=379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
 http://www.nielsenmedia.com/nc/portal/site/Public/menuitem.55dc65b4a7d5adff3f65936147a062a0/?vgnextoid=e7cb07dd40b55110VgnVCM100000ac0a260aRCRD
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dataforbreakfast.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/trust-in-forms-of-advertising.gif" title="trust-in-forms-of-advertising.gif"><img src="http://dataforbreakfast.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/trust-in-forms-of-advertising.gif" alt="trust-in-forms-of-advertising.gif" height="534" width="534" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.nielsenmedia.com/nc/portal/site/Public/menuitem.55dc65b4a7d5adff3f65936147a062a0/?vgnextoid=e7cb07dd40b55110VgnVCM100000ac0a260aRCRD" target="_blank"> http://www.nielsenmedia.com/nc/portal/site/Public/menuitem.55dc65b4a7d5adff3f65936147a062a0/?vgnextoid=e7cb07dd40b55110VgnVCM100000ac0a260aRCRD</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dataforbreakfast.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=379</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Search Language: Value Determinants</title>
		<link>http://dataforbreakfast.com/?p=377</link>
		<comments>http://dataforbreakfast.com/?p=377#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 17:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dataforbreakfast.com/?p=377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Free, Discount, Cheap and other Value Determinants
A couple of weeks ago Sandra, Hitwise analyst in Asia Pacific, wrote a post on what she terms &#8220;search value determinants&#8221; to consider the language people use when they enter search queries. To follow on her post, this is some similar US data to look at what Americans search [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3>Free, Discount, Cheap and other Value Determinants</h3>
<p>A couple of weeks ago Sandra, Hitwise analyst in Asia Pacific, wrote a post on what she terms &#8220;<a href="http://weblogs.hitwise.com/sandra-hanchard/2007/08/whats_vintage_vs_whats_cheap.html">search value determinants</a>&#8221; to consider the language people use when they enter search queries. To follow on her post, this is some similar US data to look at what Americans search for in conjunction with popular modifiers.</p>
<p>Here are the top 10 variations on some typical modifiers for the four weeks to 18th August 2007. Note that the number of variations for each go into the tens of thousands.</p>
<p><img src="http://weblogs.hitwise.com/bill-tancer/Discount%20cheap%20free.png" alt="Discount cheap free.png" height="282" width="582" /></p>
<p>The term &#8220;discount&#8221; is associated with consumer goods, &#8220;cheap&#8221; is associated with travel and free is associated with low price point items such as music and MySpace layouts.</p>
<p><img src="http://weblogs.hitwise.com/bill-tancer/Prices%20Deals%20.png" alt="Prices Deals .png" height="282" width="535" /></p>
<p>The term &#8216;prices&#8217; appears to be associated with economic indicators such as gas, gold, oil, and stock. The term &#8220;deals&#8221; is associated with travel queries (similar to &#8220;cheap&#8221;) and &#8220;used&#8221; is associated with books and cars.</p>
<p><a href="  http://weblogs.hitwise.com/bill-tancer/2007/08/post_1.html" target="_blank">  http://weblogs.hitwise.com/bill-tancer/2007/08/post_1.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dataforbreakfast.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=377</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Product Placement Value/Effect</title>
		<link>http://dataforbreakfast.com/?p=376</link>
		<comments>http://dataforbreakfast.com/?p=376#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 16:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[product placement]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dataforbreakfast.com/?p=376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[PQ Media projects that worldwide product placement spending on films and TV shows will reach $4.38 billion in 2007, up more than 30% from the 2006 figure of $3.36 billion.
 
When the exposure value of non-paid product placement is factored in, these figures more than double to $9.33 billion in 2007 and $7.76 billion in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="file:///C:/DOCUME%7E1/MELISS%7E1/LOCALS%7E1/Temp/moz-screenshot-19.jpg" /><img src="file:///C:/DOCUME%7E1/MELISS%7E1/LOCALS%7E1/Temp/moz-screenshot-20.jpg" /><span id="lblBody" class="grey_text2"><a href="http://www.pqmedia.com/" target="blank">PQ Media</a> projects that worldwide product placement spending on films and TV shows will reach $4.38 billion in 2007, up more than 30% from the 2006 figure of $3.36 billion.</span></p>
<p><img src="file:///C:/DOCUME%7E1/MELISS%7E1/LOCALS%7E1/Temp/moz-screenshot-21.jpg" /> <span id="lblBody" class="grey_text2"><img src="http://www.emarketer.com/images/chart_gifs/082001-083000/082164.gif" /></span></p>
<p><span id="lblBody" class="grey_text2">When the exposure value of non-paid product placement is factored in, these figures more than double to $9.33 billion in 2007 and $7.76 billion in 2006.</span></p>
<p><span id="lblBody" class="grey_text2"><img src="http://www.emarketer.com/images/chart_gifs/082001-083000/082166.gif" /></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.nielsenmedia.com/" target="blank">Nielsen Media Research</a> found that between October 2005 and June 2006, 58% of respondents recognized a brand after viewing a product placement in conjunction with a commercial, versus 47% recognition among those who saw only the commercial.</p>
<p><span id="lblBody" class="grey_text2"><img src="http://www.emarketer.com/images/chart_gifs/078001-079000/078616.gif" /></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?id=1005444&amp;src=article2_newsltr" target="_blank"> http://www.emarketer.com/Article.aspx?id=1005444&amp;src=article2_newsltr</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dataforbreakfast.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=376</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>eMartketer: Online Music Data</title>
		<link>http://dataforbreakfast.com/?p=374</link>
		<comments>http://dataforbreakfast.com/?p=374#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 15:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dataforbreakfast.com/?p=374</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Who&#8217;s to blame for falling music sales? Illegal music downloaders? Internet radio consumers? Britney Spears?
Regardless of the cause, the music industry has largely seen declining music sales as a crucible. The theory was that although fewer people bought music, the remaining buyers were true fans, and that digital downloads would eventually compensate for falling CD [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dataforbreakfast.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/worldwide-online-music-rev-06-11.gif" title="worldwide-online-music-rev-06-11.gif"><img src="http://dataforbreakfast.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/worldwide-online-music-rev-06-11.gif" alt="worldwide-online-music-rev-06-11.gif" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://dataforbreakfast.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/worldwide-recording-industry-rev-by-segment-06-11.gif" title="worldwide-recording-industry-rev-by-segment-06-11.gif"><img src="http://dataforbreakfast.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/worldwide-recording-industry-rev-by-segment-06-11.gif" alt="worldwide-recording-industry-rev-by-segment-06-11.gif" /></a></p>
<p>Who&#8217;s to blame for falling music sales? Illegal music downloaders? Internet radio consumers? Britney Spears?</p>
<p>Regardless of the cause, the music industry has largely seen declining music sales as a crucible. The theory was that although fewer people bought music, the remaining buyers were true fans, and that digital downloads would eventually compensate for falling CD sales. But even though sales are still declining, the music super-consumer has yet to emerge, according to <a href="http://www.bridgeratings.com/" target="blank">Bridge Ratings</a> data.</p>
<p><span id="lblBody" class="grey_text2">&#8220;An interesting finding is the steep increase in the percentage of the population that bought music in 2006 compared with the previous year,&#8221; said Paul Verna, eMarketer senior analyst.</span></p>
<p><a href="http://dataforbreakfast.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/us-music-purchasers-1980-2006.gif" title="us-music-purchasers-1980-2006.gif"><img src="http://dataforbreakfast.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/us-music-purchasers-1980-2006.gif" alt="us-music-purchasers-1980-2006.gif" /></a></p>
<p><span id="lblBody" class="grey_text2">Yet the average price per purchase is being reduced by the large numbers of consumers buying single MP3 downloads.</p>
<p>The 30% drop in compact disc sales from 2000 to 2005 was too steep to be offset by digital sales. The 16% drop in CD sales from 2005 to 2006 was partially offset by digital download sales growth.</p>
<p>The net effect is still a falling average price per music purchase, decreasing overall music revenues.</p>
<p>eMarketer interpolated the Bridge data with <a href="http://www.census.gov/" target="blank">US Census Bureau</a> population estimates dating back to 1980. While the total number of US music consumers has more than doubled to 96 million in 2006 from 45 million in 1980, annual per capita music expenditures have dropped drastically to $120 in 2006, from $198 in 1980.</p>
<p>&#8220;In other words,&#8221; Mr. Verna said, &#8220;a lot more people may be buying music these days, but they&#8217;re spending a whole lot less, on average, than they did at any point in the recent or more distant past.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://dataforbreakfast.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/annual-music-spending-per-capita-in-the-us-1980-2006.gif" title="annual-music-spending-per-capita-in-the-us-1980-2006.gif"><img src="http://dataforbreakfast.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/annual-music-spending-per-capita-in-the-us-1980-2006.gif" alt="annual-music-spending-per-capita-in-the-us-1980-2006.gif" /></a></p>
<p><span id="lblBody" class="grey_text2">Again, tabulating Bridge Ratings&#8217; percentages against Census Bureau statistics shows the track-driven download model pioneered by iTunes is broadening the universe of music consumers.</span></p>
<p></span></p>
<blockquote><p><span id="lblBody" class="grey_text2"> Wonder what <span id="lblBody" class="grey_text2">Radiohead&#8217;s potentially <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/02/arts/music/02radi.html" target="blank">ground-breaking</a> move: putting its new album, &#8220;In Rainbows,&#8221; out there for fans to pay what they want will do for the industry.</span></p>
<p></span></p></blockquote>
<p><span id="lblBody" class="grey_text2"></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dataforbreakfast.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=374</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Streaming Video Becoming a Habit At All Age Levels</title>
		<link>http://dataforbreakfast.com/?p=367</link>
		<comments>http://dataforbreakfast.com/?p=367#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 22:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dataforbreakfast.com/?p=367</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Advertising.com, Inc., in their Bi-Annual Online VideoStudy, comparing the  first half of 2007 with the last half of 2006, reports that 62 percent of survey  respondents are viewing video online and are comprised mostly of those ages 35  and older viewing news clips. Analyzed by age group, 31 percent of 18 to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><font>Advertising.com, Inc., in their Bi-Annual Online VideoStudy, comparing the  first half of 2007 with the last half of 2006, reports that 62 percent of survey  respondents are viewing video online and are comprised mostly of those ages 35  and older viewing news clips. Analyzed by age group, 31 percent of 18 to 34 year  olds watch streaming video, while 69 percent of consumers ages 35 and older view  streaming video online. </font></p>
<p><font>Approximately 83 percent of consumers surveyed indicat­ed that their online  video usage in 2007 has either stayed the same or increased since 2006. More  specifically, 36 percent of consumers have increased their consumption of online  video, with an even breakdown between men (36 percent) and women (37  percent).</font></p>
<p><font>The majority of consumers are streaming online video at home rather than work  or school, with 45 percent of streaming activity taking place in the evening.  95% stream at home; 4% at work; 1% at school or university.</font></p>
<p><font>More than 62 percent of consumers said they are most likely to stream news  clips, with movie trailers and music videos next in line. Compared to the second  half of 2006, consumers are streaming fewer music videos and streaming more news  clips, user-gen­erated videos and sports clips. However, these consumption  behaviors vary dramatically by age.</font></p>
<p><a href="http://dataforbreakfast.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/a18-34-streaming-content-categories.jpg" title="a18-34-streaming-content-categories.jpg"><img src="http://dataforbreakfast.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/a18-34-streaming-content-categories.jpg" alt="a18-34-streaming-content-categories.jpg" height="253" width="340" /></a></p>
<p><font>Overall, 42 percent of consumers have forwarded a vid­eo clip to a friend.  Consumers who view content more than once a week also forward more clips, with  55 percent forward­ing clips vs. 34 percent and 20 percent for those who view  content once a week and once a m</font><font>onth. Women (47 percent) forward more clips than  men (36 percent). </font></p>
<p><a href="http://dataforbreakfast.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/a18-34-streaming-activities.gif" title="a18-34-streaming-activities.gif"><img src="http://dataforbreakfast.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/a18-34-streaming-activities.gif" alt="a18-34-streaming-activities.gif" height="261" width="345" /></a></p>
<p><font>Other highlights of the study include:</font></p>
<ul> <font></p>
<li>80% of consumers say that online video usage does not cut into their TV  time.</li>
<li>29% of men say online video usage cuts into TV</li>
<li>16% of women say online video usage cuts into TV</li>
<li>12% of those who view content once a month claim that video usage cuts into  their TV time</li>
<li>94% of consumers indi­cate that they would prefer to view ads than pay a fee  to watch video content online.</li>
<li>63% of consumers would prefer online vid­eo ads that are shorter than TV ads</li>
<li>65% of consumers say they watch online video ads through to completion</li>
<li>72% of consumers who view streaming content more than once a week view video  ads through to completion</li>
<li>Of those who view content only once a month, 49% view advertising through to  completion.</li>
<li>Consumers are 8% more likely to view 15-second spots to completion than  30-second spots.</li>
<li>The 30-second pre-roll format slightly outperforms the 5- and 15-second ads  when measured in terms of click-through rate.</li>
<p></font></ul>
<p><a href="http://dataforbreakfast.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/what-would-make-online-ads-more-pleasurable.jpg" title="what-would-make-online-ads-more-pleasurable.jpg"><img src="http://dataforbreakfast.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/what-would-make-online-ads-more-pleasurable.jpg" alt="what-would-make-online-ads-more-pleasurable.jpg" height="284" width="350" /></a></p>
<p><font>In</font><font> conclusion, the report summarizes by noting that consumers continue to  incorporate streaming video into the online experience, but there remains a  difference, however, among older and younger consumers.</font></p>
<p><font>Older consumers using streaming video in order to gain more information,  which can be seen by their preference for online news clips, while younger  consumers are streaming content for entertainment purposes, such as viewing  movies, TV shows and user-generated videos online.</font></p>
<p><font>C</font><font>onsumers between the ages of 18 and 34, says the report, continue to  assimilate streaming content more into their everyday media consumption habits.  Sixty-nine percent of their online video streaming occurs more than once a week,  while 47 percent of those ages 35 and older view streaming video multiple times  a week</font></p>
<p><a href="http://dataforbreakfast.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/research-biannualvideoreport.pdf" title="research-biannualvideoreport.pdf">research-biannualvideoreport.pdf</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dataforbreakfast.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=367</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
